La infracción constitucional de la imparcialidad judicial en el proceso por delito de ejercicio privado de la acción penal

Fuentes: histórico de OJS (PKP, por objeto) + tracker en la revista + 10 vista(s) en este índice. Citas: Crossref 1 · OpenAlex 1; se muestra el mayor.

Resumen

The present thesis was developed by means of a qualitative research, through the analysis of dogmatic and normative pronouncements and above all jurisprudential criteria issued by means of national and international Courts, with the objective of determining if there is a constitutional infringement to the judicial impartiality in the normative content of the special process for crimes of private action, obtaining as a result that this special criminal process unlike the common process has only 2 procedural stages of admissibility and oral trial, The conclusion is that there is a direct affectation to the fundamental right of judicial impartiality as an expression of the guarantee of due process, since it would be a contaminated Judge under the knowledge of the admissibility of the case, who would be in charge of issuing the substantive pronouncement by means of the sentence, thus there is a need for a legislative modification of this normative section.

Lecturas por mes y tendencia

Barras: vistas del resumen y lecturas de archivos (tracker + índice). Línea punteada: tendencia lineal y predicción de 3 meses (estimación estadística, no un dato).

Palabras clave

Private ActionJudicial ImpartialityFundamental RightsCriminal ProcedureAcción PrivadaImparcialidad JudicialDerechos FundamentalesProceso Penal